The 6-1/2 Lb. 2.75 inch warhead with 40mm AP dummy projo as the fuze is a classic.
The yellow one is an incendiary, if I recall correctly it is around 20lb. I've only seen them one other time, but have yet to find any documentation. As far as I know the UK had stopped with the Livens before 39, but the US kept it through 1945 - non-destructive defense of the Panama Canal. I have a TM on the livens dated I think 1944.
Minenaz16, I'll have to check the file to see if there are additional shots of the nomen.
The one you have shown is a British one. So they must have had them back in 1939 it seems.
The following British reports are from the time period 1939 - 1943 Bursters for Livens projectors: reports. Includes 16 photographs depicting: |
Design of Livens drum: improvements to increase range |
Comparative trials of Livens drum with various other bombs |
Report on trials with Livens Drums charged HM fitted with various bursters and fired |
Experiments with Livens projectors |
Comparison of the 8 inch chemical projector (Livens) and the 8 inch chemical rocket as ... |
Livens drum: trials of various bursters |
Trials with air burst Liven's Drums charged mustard substitute |
Vesicant charging of Livens drum projectors: performance trials |
Charging, sealing and storage of Livens drums |
Defective chemical weapons, charged: Livens drums |
Livens projectors range table and wind correction graph |
Concentrations of phosgene from a company shoot of Livens projectors |
Gas charging of Livens drum projectors: performance trials |
Brilliant example of the SP BU 37.........10 litre version i think.
Any idea on the grey drum? Is it Japanese?
Pete
The first projo is a U.S. Navy 5 inch 38 cal WP Smoke with an Army style lifting ring installed, which would never be issued that way as Navy ammo was issued with the fuzes installed and fuze protectors screwed on over the fuze.
Jeff,
On the 152mm Canister, it is shown broken apart above the rotating band. Can you describe the type of joint that holds the lower body to the upper skin at that location? It looks like it might have been a tapered joint with epoxy holding the two halves together, or was it a threaded joint? Any closeups of the joint details?