What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2cm Br Spgr VK l'spur

MINENAZ16

Well-Known Member
Ordnance approved
I found two different diagrams for the 2cm Br Spgr VK l'spur.
I only saw a shell with short tracer cavity (same as the 1st diagram).
Is it a mistake (second diagram) ?

VK.jpgVK 2.jpg
 
Do I get it right, that these are projectiles for the 20x138B Flak ? Could you explain what the abbreviation " v.k. " stands for ? It seems to suggest that a "verkürzte Leuchtspur" (shortened tracer) is meant, but then the spelling does not fit. I did not find it in the "H.Dv.4812_Merkblatt_Munition_2cmWaffen", that I do have as a .pdf-document.

Thanks in advance and best regards from Germany,
urg86-collector
 
That's a legitimate question I also noticed this strange abbreviation. To add more confusion I also found it written "v.K." several times and "vk"
 
That makes also no sense, it would make sense in the opposite direction like vergrößerter Kopf but what is a Kopf on a 2 cm shell? Kopf means head and cannot be translated as body. To much guessing for my taste.
 
Similar to the 2 cm Br.Sprgr.Patr. vk L’spur there was also a 3,7 cm Br.Sprgr.Patr. vk L’spur.

In the Waffen-Revue nr. 68 (Pawlas) “vk” is described as “verkürzte” , see below.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3234.JPG
    IMG_3234.JPG
    495.7 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_0313.jpg
    IMG_0313.jpg
    383.5 KB · Views: 13
Thanks for the responses. In this spelling it is quite understandable, but why then the dots between the letters in the other spelling ? And as Alpini states, both exist side by side. Another enigma :)
 
One more thing not to forget: I read a lot of WW1 and WW2 official military documents. Spelling is often really miserable and I think the way words were abbreviated also changed like spelling rules changed or did not even exist. Normally I would think that the people which worked in war ministry, etc. had a good education but the documents often but the documents indicate the opposite. Maybe also a lot of failures happened because the documents were written by secretaries which had no clue about the thematic. I have seen official documents where for example Flak (Anti Aircraft Gun) was written "Flack" - ouch.
 
Top