What's new
British Ordnance Collectors Network

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Bombs conical tail question

Speedy

Well-Known Member
In the 1950s for some old World War Two GP bombs like AN-M64/-65/-66 family, USAF developed a new elongated conical tail with delta fins, installed instead of old, box-type, for better stabilization when dropped at high speed/ high altitude. Were there conical tails for any AP or SAP bombs? Like e.g. 1600 lb AP AN-Mk.1 or 2000 lb SAP M103?

BTW what was a prototype SAP M103 designation? (T...)
 
To the best of my understanding, by the mid fifties the 1600 lb AP had been phased out of service, so the issue of the conical fin assembly is not relevant for this bomb.
The 2000lb SAP would be phased out by the end of the same decade. However these bombs kept appearing in bombs related documents as "obsolete" are the stocks were not still completely emptied - and this still the mid sixties.
The 1000 lb AN-M59A2 seems to have been the only SAP to be still in service by the mid sixties, still equipped with a ww2 box-type in.
Bombs in Service 1966 Navy Screenshot 2025-03-07 095646.jpg

It must be well understood that the conical fin assembly was defined as an "intermediary" stage, designed to enable the use of existing stocks of ww2-era bombs in the mid-/late fifties till their replacement by "modern bombs" - the M117 / M118/ M121 and the Mk 80/81/82/83/84 series.
These conical fin assemblies were in fact specifically designed for the GP bombs - here's a timetable of their development with establishement of the suited bombing tables
Bombing Table for 100-lb. G.P. Bomb AN-M30A1 with Fin Assembly M135 1/2/1955
Bombing Table for 250-lb. G.P. Bomb AN-M57A1 with Fin Assembly M126 13/1/1954
Bombing Table for 500-lb. G.P. Bomb AN-M64A1 with Fin Assembly M128 19/1/1954
Bombing Table for 1000-lb. G.P. Bomb AN-M65A1 with Fin Assembly M129 23/7/1957
Bombing Table for 2000-lb. G.P. Bomb AN-M66A2 with Fin Assembly AN-M116A1 or M116 4/2/1952

The following tables give the various assemblies (box and conical) possible for US bombs during this intermediary period (As it is a Navy documents, it includes Navy bombs - a peculiarity ingerited from teh interwar period, that was not entirely superseded by the AN series, but will disappear with the "modern" bomb series that will finally unify the US air-dropped arsenal.)

Stabilizing components (fin assemblies) Screenshot 2025-03-07 092953.jpg
Stabilizing components Part 2 (fin assemblies) Screenshot 2025-03-07 092953.jpg

Hope this helps.
 
Thank you for detailed answer!
So I think 2000 lb M103 SAP without conical tail would be quite useless in the 60's.
You know about Project Ruby, an Anglo-American test of various bombs against German reinforced concrete U-Boat assembly plant in Farge, conducted in 1946. Among others, they first dropped 2000 lb M103 (from B-17) from 26,250 ft (8000 m) altitude for maximum striking velocity 1100 fps (335 m/s) - high-subsonic range. And the accuracy was extremely poor, because bombs were completely unstable, wobbling or falling flat.
So if this bomb would be dropped from faster than B-17 jet plane, the effect could be worse, even from lower altitude.
 
Top